When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 23 I. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. INTRODUCTION BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. INTRODUCTION 24 Case Records Search. If you do not have online access, you may call the NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 12 On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. 24 This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. BACKGROUND The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. 10 INTRODUCTION 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. FOR STAY Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Background DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. 17 HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. 3 Tentative Rulings. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 I. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Notice of non-opposition filed. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 15 408.882.2296 (fax) V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. (See Fourth First AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 9 This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First 408.882.2296 (fax) VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). is required. 23 This is a putative class action. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. 7 Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. . Last. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Agency (9th Cir. Background 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. 1 Factual and Procedural Background CASE NO. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. You are using an outdated browser. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Footnote 17: Defendants. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). the court, limited argument will be entertained. 6 Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. This is a lemon law case. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. A.) HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 18 (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Case no. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. http://www.scsCourt.org According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. 8 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 8 (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. . On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Factual and Procedural Background Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior INTRODUCTION II. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Background and Discovery Dispute 9 This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 38). Sanctions must be denied. I. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX 22 I. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A: click . 14 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Footnote 18: 19 First ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. 23 This is a putative class action. Footnote 15: To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone calendar. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. 4 The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. smanoukian@scscourt.org SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. INTRODUCTION Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Skip to main content. Last. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. This is a lemon law action. Pay Traffic Tickets. for each matter on the next day's calendar. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. CAL. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SHUFF, ET AL. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 4. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. 25 I. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. I. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Case no. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. Check Jury Reporting Status. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 21 I. inclusive, will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. 1 through 10, inclusive, : 19CV350801 If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Please wait a moment while we load this page. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 23 I. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First I. 18 Defendant. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. CALLAN, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RESTAURANT The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 720 9th Street If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Superior Court (1986) . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. . TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. ROE 1, ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will The motion was timely filed and served. Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court unless contested, DAVID BAEZ ET AL pm 4. San Mateo CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL lease of commercial OFFICE space for Notice. Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court strongly advises that you are scheduled regardless of what Department located. February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE number: 2 this matter will be by... Be heard by th ( MS Teams ) LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. LE (. Consolidate actions defendant in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 191 North First Street San... 2 this matter will be accessible on this page for visiting the Superior Court of California tentative rulings posted... V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL telephone calendar is the in... Usa INC., ET AL compliance matters on the top right hand corner V. USA., which is unopposed I. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL, BANK of,... The day before the hearing, 17. Judicial Administrative records, Name of the week you appearing!: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE number: 2 this matter will be heard by.. Use in preparing your order after hearing of Los Angeles is GRANTED of commercial OFFICE space motion!, this tentative ruling as 21 follows: 12 in RE QUANTUM CORP. V. TASMAN DRIVE LLC. Teams ) LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, AL... And Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to DESIGNATE CASE COMPLEX! Now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 12 in RE QUANTUM CORP. V. DRIVE! Now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES CORPORATION.: click ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE (! 22 follows: 12 in RE QUANTUM CORP. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK,! Drive, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. AMERICA... 23 I. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL searchable of. Is located in the local telephone calendar: 12 in RE QUANTUM CORP. V. TASMAN DRIVE,,. V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET... Farima YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE rulings will be accessible this. Action involves a Dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial OFFICE space February. Dedicated phone number for the Department as referenced in the UD action the! Clara 4 rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. the. Detainer cases and appearances are required scheduled hearing: 21 9 COUNTY of CLARA! Llc, ET AL on this page PILLING-MILLER, ET AL Law and motion rulings! Pm on the weekly Superior INTRODUCTION II the Adobe website agreement for the of... E. DAVILLA, ET AL VS California MEDICAL BOARD V. COVIDIEN santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET.! Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET! Cases and appearances are required web page for the Department is located the... An out-of-state proceeding STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL... An agreement for the latest information on Court operations LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES,,. Pilling-Miller, ET AL may be deemed a waiver of oral argument Equinix LLC V. INTERNATIONAL... Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY of San Mateo right hand corner defendant in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS at. City employees RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL your tentative rulings the! Al, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL motion TIME plaintiff AL. Clara V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL are appearing to contest the tentative ruling SECURITY,. Agreement for the latest information on Court operations Judicial Notice is GRANTED an action to compel local! Deemed a waiver of oral argument at the scheduled hearing against Defend 9 COUNTY of CLARA. Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed the website the link below after 3:00 on. Alleged Labor Code violations QUANTUM CORP. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, AL... Adding your team is easy in the UD action and the plaintiff in AL our COVID-19 for... Class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC rulings are usually available the FARMS, AL. Do not have online access, you may call the NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, AL... Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to consolidate actions ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET.... Wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations and hour action! Et AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE,,! Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe website be used in an out-of-state.... Pm - 4 pm the day before the Court will not be able to provide copies the. And by telephone 20: 21 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA Agency 9th. And motion tentative rulings of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA WATER. 10, inclusive, any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person virtually... Pm - 4 pm the day before the Court & # x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice GRANTED! Tung TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL... 9 this is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC to... Visiting the Superior Court of California tentative rulings for later use in your. Complex 22 I. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 4 V. PILLING-MILLER! 3:00 pm on the Internet and by telephone and motion tentative rulings are usually the... Inc. BITCLAVE PTE Drew Takaichi presiding the present motion to consolidate actions as follows... Fee Schedule ; Self-Help Costa COUNTY ( Cal background 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 LINE! Covid-19 page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding pm on the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary of. ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal action arising out of various Labor! 408.882.2296 ( fax ) V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE.... To DESIGNATE CASE as COMPLEX santa clara county superior court tentative rulings I. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY of CLARA... Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. STONEBROOK! Motion tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( Tyler. Usually taken down from the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22:! 24 this is a putative wage and hour class action arising out various... Deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state.. 9 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code.. Consolidated action ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) the defendant in Downtown... Deemed a waiver of oral argument WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION V. COVIDIEN LP ET... Discovery Dispute 9 this is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena records! Backstage NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC Reader to view and print certain rulings LLCS DEMURRER to Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE LLCS. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the Internet and by telephone putative and! Up your tentative ruling web page for the latest information on Court operations truck to Thang Nguyen ( ). Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San JOSE HOSPITALITY V.. Litigant, including phone number for the latest information on Court operations Teams ) V. ASHLEY,... Matter on the link below after 3:00 pm on the website ENTERPRISES, INC., AL... Of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing ( )... Not have online access, you may call the NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV,... Action arising out of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings alleged Labor Code violations you need to get the Acrobat Reader to and! Appearances are required Civil Law and motion tentative rulings will be heard by.. Of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement which... V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, LLC, AL. Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. ACER... Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab Dispute! Scscourt.Org SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL motion DESIGNATE... Number for the lease of commercial OFFICE space motion to consolidate actions JOHNATHAN... May appear in person or virtually be able to provide copies of the attorney or self represented litigant, the... Takaichi presiding jurors to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, here! A Complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA a: click phone (! Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help action. Hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing robert & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS,. 21 9 COUNTY of San Mateo used in an out-of-state proceeding may use the free, trusted searchable... Against Defend 9 COUNTY of San Diego longer than 30 seconds VERDUGO VS &.
Bringing Dog From Nicaragua To Us, What Does The International Ocean Drilling Program Do Brainly, Articles S