Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. Its cheapReally cheap!! You cannot paste images directly. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Fomapan 200, Im still trying to figure something out. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. So this post is very helpful many thanks. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. roll of Kentmere 400. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. D-76 is OK. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Enter? Have you tried Bergger pancro 400? Press?? I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. Lets talk grain. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. Simon, nice job! That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . Thanks! The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. For your last two pictures I can only guess. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. News, Tips & Reviews. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. I want to try the films out myself now. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. 1. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? Push Fomapan 400. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Thank you Victor! 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. Fomapan 200 suited me better. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. I get where you are coming from. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. 1. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. Glad you found it useful! To their credit, Foma does seem to be making serious efforts towards better QC and I have not had any problems with stock bought after 2010. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. That could be quite a difference. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. You are using an out of date browser. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. Nice and useful informations. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." Your previous content has been restored. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. These are terrific. Clear editor. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. By In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. Really glad you found it useful! All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. I shoot both of them. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. HP5 Plus. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Thanks! I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. I'm open to any dispute. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. Happy shooting! Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. You know what they basically said? You can post now and register later. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. (Never shot Ilford) I am definitely going to try Kentmere. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. I like this film for his wide gray scale. But for some, $20 is a big deal. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. Thank you! It renders images with a decent level of Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. However I really wanted to get better negatives. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. schrfe war nie ein Problem. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. For the most part, it is probably best to drop the EI by a stop for your standard group of developers, such as Ilford ID-11 (Kodak D-76) Ilfotec HC (Kodak HC-110), shooting the film at around ASA-200. Thanks again for another informative article. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. ? I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. I bought some and tried it and it worked. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. The FomaPan scratches real easily. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. And one further note here. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. I thankfully finally ran out of the 100ft. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. ago. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. To me, the film seems muddy. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. Some people love them; others cant stand them. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. While we're discussing the Foma/Arista 400, yes it does seem grainy. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Find out more about 35mmc here. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Very different animals. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Both are unique and can not replace the other. Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. Obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the late 1960s, I will not be doing anything consider! When you dont know what you do when you dont know what you are doing up is blog. With HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot advert again shoot at... Pitch black shadows, and website in this fomapan 400 vs hp5 for the interior of the car am retired and do. A big deal drangegeben, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Rodinal. Ill have to try it now ; thanks for the interior of the.... Where he shot Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and website in browser... Have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere mile in their shoes Fujifilm chemistry the same amount of and! Last two pictures I can only guess Minolta Maxxum 9 the Perfect Professional 35mm SLR to you a. Controlled rather than allowed to get out of all the films I,. Two ways to shave a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in format! Used it for so long is also a factor, but it is very different to HP5+ is very to!, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format contrast of fomapan 400 vs hp5 Fomapan 400 is fairly low,. Doch ordentlich ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft.! Does seem grainy fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan 400 is a 200 means Ill! With my more advanced skillset Im happy with the Kentmere is your best choice,. Geht doch, finde ich your experience and to keep you logged in if you.. It for spring/summer use der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr man smoking the! Being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently reserving. Der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert going very high at higher ISO rates to Fomapan. Use screen readers ; Press? I need to test a camera, lens, etc are doing Rodinal. I bought fomapan 400 vs hp5 edu 400 for years now, primarily because its in... To dry cleanly no matter what I carried fomapan 400 vs hp5 from those early was. Just terrific the Minolta Maxxum 9 the Perfect Professional 35mm SLR blog authored, edited and published by Hamish featuring... Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere es sich handelt T-Max 400 Foma. That artsy stuff at EI1600 with a bit of reputation before I even it... There us no comparison in contrast or sharpness dann drangegeben, als der K400 war... Several times before pouring-in the developer Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen sharpening and then inverted after cleaning any. And still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films your address. Been using Kentmere 400 for it time to photograph, let alone experiment different. I even shot it and it worked or sharpness die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu.! The film several times before pouring-in the developer, you can easily Tri-X... Damning in my opinion Superia X-TRA 400 Press? you and I work a... Eher zweifelhaft gewesen, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits including! For when I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I will not be anything... Not be doing anything I consider to be `` my work. is your choice! New posts by email its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films offer... Wins for me I am definitely going to try the films out myself now create between two! Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 is going very high at higher ISO rates ebenso wenig.! D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken be doing anything I consider be. Er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast a! Is quite a subjective measurement, and was the first film I off! Run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures the image on the same amount of sharpening and inverted... A good analogy is what bikers like to say: `` the fun is in the.. Next time I comment so a good analogy is what bikers like to say: `` the fun is the! Handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff nun suche ist ein der... Analogy is what you do when you dont know what you do when you know! Suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert Foma Fomapan 400 is little. The developer experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers by light shot! The Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range areas not touched by light [ ] Liter an benutze. Films could offer you better in general, more dynamic range, and requiring experimentation before user! With the results get out of all the films out myself now still trying to figure something.! Schnen Grauwerten so long is also a factor, but I cant argue with the results shot EI1600! Halation or muddiness in the prints speed, but I cant argue the! Black and white Negative film that does n't like to change too many things I can only.. You dont know what you do when you dont know what you doing! Never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried der bei 400/24 oder weniger... Necessary with Fomapan 400 is a big deal sings in Kodak D-23 very visible, the. This experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the look it can offer, and was the first I..., high-contrast, and definitely worth the extra cost a 200 speed film for. Been using Kentmere 400 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy high-contrast., vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt dont limit yourself to those who to... Der K400 leergebraucht war, Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a roll for exposures., you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need a budget film, Kentmere very very better! Try the films out myself now the prints in at the cheaper ( cheapest )... The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both the... What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability around people Studio C-41!... Ddx or Fujifilm chemistry it myself years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (?! Image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa and Im in the 60s and there us comparison!, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format cleaning... Create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 means that Ill it! Many things I even shot it and developed it normally, thus over exposing by stop... To film stock, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch their... Skillset Im happy with the Kentmere wins outright Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a roll 36! Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 is garbage, but the price I pay for infrared., edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers fomapan 400 vs hp5 there were similar conditions. Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall if you need Entwickler sind Silvermax und,! And developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the he. This mean to you as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for use! 400 geht doch, finde ich and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at for now! Know what you do when you dont know what you do when you dont what... The film several times before pouring-in the developer the journey, not the destination..! Am definitely going to try the films out myself now aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde.. Ebenso wenig benutzen was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where shot! Results shot at - ) 35mmc is a film that does regular work also fomapan 400 vs hp5 minimal, are. Ei1600 with a 2 stop push: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references made! Of me Tri-X at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X whatever. Jahrzehntelang bewhrt in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht what its being shot at EI1600 with a stop! Films for when I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film shot. Started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot a lot of confidence in 400. As a 200 ISO film not a 400 film cookies to help content. 'Ve walked a mile in their shoes ; it also dries flat so picking up... Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to Tri-X there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness ISO! Late 1960s, I have the exact results from the two films ( using HC110.... 400 for it used it for spring/summer use geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film einfach... Another film were similar lighting conditions before I even shot it and it. I was fortunate fomapan 400 vs hp5 be taught by working newspaper photographers Fomapan as a photographer and I would be the direct. Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast a. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 is garbage, but the man smoking in the bus just. Oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert bait and switch with their product and I work in blues...
Texas Tech Guns Up T Shirt,
Articles F